My
favorite item from the growing mountain of Pride and Prejudice
bicentennial trivia comes courtesy of an article in something called
Regency World Magazine, which is going gaga over the anniversary. The
article, "Albert Goes Ape for Austen," describes how a 200-pound
orangutan named Albert, living in the Gdansk Zoo in Poland, insists on
having 50 pages a night of Pride and Prejudice read to him at bedtime by
his keeper or else he refuses to go to sleep.
What does Albert the orangutan hear in Pride and Prejudice, I wonder? Maybe the same thing my students hear when I teach survey courses on the evolution of the novel. We start our voyage out with Robinson Crusoe and often go on to Samuel Richardson's Pamela and Laurence Sterne's Tristram Shandy — fine, weird novels that seem to hail from a civilization a million light years from our own. Then we arrive home, on Planet Austen.
The relief in the classroom is palpable; the energy of class discussion spikes. It's certainly not that my students mistake Austen's world for our own. After all, her novels revolve around the make-or-break perils of a highly ritualized marriage market. Rather, it's Austen's smart-girl voice: peppery, wry, eye rolling — that seems so close to modern consciousness. Austen could be gal pals with Tina Fey and Lena Dunham; she talks to us directly, bridging time and custom.
Pride and Prejudice, Austen's most widely read novel, was first published on Jan. 28, 1813, and has since generated musicals and computer games, operas and anime, Masterpiece Theatre costume dramas and Bollywood movies. It's been updated and reimagined as mystery fiction, sci-fi,The USB flash drives wholesale is our flagship product. X-rated erotica and vampire gore. We readers clearly want Austen's voice to go on and on — a voice that was silenced when she died at the age of 41 in 1817.
Though I could happily watch Bridget Jones's Diary for eternity, I mostly think the best way to revisit Austen and learn something new is through the art of criticism. Out of the slew of critical books that have been spawned by the book's bicentennial, one that particularly caught my eye is called The Real Jane Austen by Paula Byrne. Byrne has previously written about Austen and the theater; here, she takes a clever approach to scrutinizing the few facts that we know about Austen's life.
Byrne reads Austen's life through key objects, many of which would have surrounded her in her parlor and bedroom. There are familiar relics like the three vellum notebooks in which a juvenile Austen penned poems and stories, as well as the pair of gorgeous topaz crosses that Austen's sailor brother Charles bought for Jane and her sister, Cassandra.
Then there are more exotic tokens: an "East Indian shawl" belonged to Austen's Aunt Philadelphia, who sailed to India with other single girls in search of husbands; they were part of what was then derisively called "the fishing fleet." Byrne's aim is to show how these objects, many of them reproduced in her book in lush color plates, reveal a much more cosmopolitan awareness of the world than is commonly credited to Austen.
Byrne also throws in a wild card: a small Regency-era portrait sketch of a slim middle-aged woman, cap on head, pen in hand. The portrait's provenance is unknown; on its back someone wrote: "Miss Jane Austin," spelling the last name with an "I," as Austen herself did on her 1816 royalty check for her novel Emma.
If this is, indeed, an authentic portrait of Austen, she looks like you might want her to look: staring off into the distance, faintly smiling, perhaps getting a kick out of a vision of the great fuss futurity would make of the creatures of her imagination.
To add impetus to its request, Anonymous on Saturday promised that the Asteroids game defacements aren't the only card up its sleeve. The group tweeted on Monday,Online shopping for luggage tag from a great selection of Clothing. "How about a nice game of chess Mr Government?" According to a statement released by the group, it's infiltrated a number of government websites and databases -- it refused to disclose which ones -- and stolen sensitive information, which it's been distributing in an encrypted file that has been mirrored to numerous websites.
"The contents are various and we won't ruin the speculation by revealing them," said Anonymous. "Suffice it to say, everyone has secrets, and some things are not meant to be public.Where you can create a custom lanyard from our wide selection of styles and materials. At a regular interval commencing today, we will choose one media outlet and supply them with heavily redacted partial contents of the file."
Threats aside, Anonymous is far from the only group calling for the CFAA to be revised. Notably, George Washington University professor Orin Kerr, a former Department of Justice computer crime prosecutor,Application can be conducted with the local designated IC card producers. has proposed specific changes to CFAA, including making it harder for minor crimes to be classified as felonies.
Kerr's proposals have been picked up and refined by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF),They manufacture custom rubber and silicone bracelet and bracelets. in what calls "Aaron's Law." The group's suggestions have also been endorsed by Jennifer Granick, the director of civil liberties at the Stanford Center for Internet and Society, who described Kerr's initial efforts as "necessary but not sufficient."
Both the EFF and Granick are pushing for a better definition of "without authorization" in the CFAA, which governs when accessing a network resource or system is, or isn't, illegal. "There should be an exception to CFAA liability when a service is offered for free to the public but implements technological controls on either automation, download rate or access time," said Granick in a blog post. "Certainly evading these limits could be a civil violation, or the service may find a way to ban the offender completely, but it should not be a federal crime."
What does Albert the orangutan hear in Pride and Prejudice, I wonder? Maybe the same thing my students hear when I teach survey courses on the evolution of the novel. We start our voyage out with Robinson Crusoe and often go on to Samuel Richardson's Pamela and Laurence Sterne's Tristram Shandy — fine, weird novels that seem to hail from a civilization a million light years from our own. Then we arrive home, on Planet Austen.
The relief in the classroom is palpable; the energy of class discussion spikes. It's certainly not that my students mistake Austen's world for our own. After all, her novels revolve around the make-or-break perils of a highly ritualized marriage market. Rather, it's Austen's smart-girl voice: peppery, wry, eye rolling — that seems so close to modern consciousness. Austen could be gal pals with Tina Fey and Lena Dunham; she talks to us directly, bridging time and custom.
Pride and Prejudice, Austen's most widely read novel, was first published on Jan. 28, 1813, and has since generated musicals and computer games, operas and anime, Masterpiece Theatre costume dramas and Bollywood movies. It's been updated and reimagined as mystery fiction, sci-fi,The USB flash drives wholesale is our flagship product. X-rated erotica and vampire gore. We readers clearly want Austen's voice to go on and on — a voice that was silenced when she died at the age of 41 in 1817.
Though I could happily watch Bridget Jones's Diary for eternity, I mostly think the best way to revisit Austen and learn something new is through the art of criticism. Out of the slew of critical books that have been spawned by the book's bicentennial, one that particularly caught my eye is called The Real Jane Austen by Paula Byrne. Byrne has previously written about Austen and the theater; here, she takes a clever approach to scrutinizing the few facts that we know about Austen's life.
Byrne reads Austen's life through key objects, many of which would have surrounded her in her parlor and bedroom. There are familiar relics like the three vellum notebooks in which a juvenile Austen penned poems and stories, as well as the pair of gorgeous topaz crosses that Austen's sailor brother Charles bought for Jane and her sister, Cassandra.
Then there are more exotic tokens: an "East Indian shawl" belonged to Austen's Aunt Philadelphia, who sailed to India with other single girls in search of husbands; they were part of what was then derisively called "the fishing fleet." Byrne's aim is to show how these objects, many of them reproduced in her book in lush color plates, reveal a much more cosmopolitan awareness of the world than is commonly credited to Austen.
Byrne also throws in a wild card: a small Regency-era portrait sketch of a slim middle-aged woman, cap on head, pen in hand. The portrait's provenance is unknown; on its back someone wrote: "Miss Jane Austin," spelling the last name with an "I," as Austen herself did on her 1816 royalty check for her novel Emma.
If this is, indeed, an authentic portrait of Austen, she looks like you might want her to look: staring off into the distance, faintly smiling, perhaps getting a kick out of a vision of the great fuss futurity would make of the creatures of her imagination.
To add impetus to its request, Anonymous on Saturday promised that the Asteroids game defacements aren't the only card up its sleeve. The group tweeted on Monday,Online shopping for luggage tag from a great selection of Clothing. "How about a nice game of chess Mr Government?" According to a statement released by the group, it's infiltrated a number of government websites and databases -- it refused to disclose which ones -- and stolen sensitive information, which it's been distributing in an encrypted file that has been mirrored to numerous websites.
"The contents are various and we won't ruin the speculation by revealing them," said Anonymous. "Suffice it to say, everyone has secrets, and some things are not meant to be public.Where you can create a custom lanyard from our wide selection of styles and materials. At a regular interval commencing today, we will choose one media outlet and supply them with heavily redacted partial contents of the file."
Threats aside, Anonymous is far from the only group calling for the CFAA to be revised. Notably, George Washington University professor Orin Kerr, a former Department of Justice computer crime prosecutor,Application can be conducted with the local designated IC card producers. has proposed specific changes to CFAA, including making it harder for minor crimes to be classified as felonies.
Kerr's proposals have been picked up and refined by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF),They manufacture custom rubber and silicone bracelet and bracelets. in what calls "Aaron's Law." The group's suggestions have also been endorsed by Jennifer Granick, the director of civil liberties at the Stanford Center for Internet and Society, who described Kerr's initial efforts as "necessary but not sufficient."
Both the EFF and Granick are pushing for a better definition of "without authorization" in the CFAA, which governs when accessing a network resource or system is, or isn't, illegal. "There should be an exception to CFAA liability when a service is offered for free to the public but implements technological controls on either automation, download rate or access time," said Granick in a blog post. "Certainly evading these limits could be a civil violation, or the service may find a way to ban the offender completely, but it should not be a federal crime."
没有评论:
发表评论